American Judiciary, Part 8: The Impeachment of Samuel Chase

The New Nation
Written By Tom Hand

Samuel Chase is the only Supreme Court Justice in our nation’s history to be impeached and that occurred during a political tussle over the independence and power of the judiciary between President Thomas Jefferson and Chief Justice John Marshall. In March 1804, the House of Representatives, in a party line vote, approved eight charges of impeachment against Chase. The problem was that the Constitution states that civil officers like Supreme Court justices may only be removed for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and Chase was not charged with any of these. But that was just the point; the Chase trial was part of a larger Democratic-Republican plan to reduce the power and independence of the judiciary.

Tom Hand, creator and publisher of Americana Corner, discusses the impeachment of Samuel Chase, and why it still matters today. 

Images courtesy of the National Portrait Gallery - Smithsonian Institution, National Gallery of Art, Library of Congress, New York Public Library, House of Representatives, National Archives, Wikimedia. 

RELATED ARTICLES
American Judiciary, Part 8: The Impeachment of Samuel Chase
American Judiciary, Part 8: The Impeachment of Samuel Chase

There has been only one instance in our nation’s history of a United States Supreme Court Justice being impeached, and that occurred in 1804 during a significant political tussle over the independence and power of the judiciary. The justice in question was Samuel Chase and his alleged crimes seem trivial in retrospect, but Chase was simply a pawn in an ongoing battle of wills between two American icons, President Thomas Jefferson and Chief Justice John Marshall that took place in the early 1800s. And the decision reached in his case would have a profound impact on the future of the country. 

American Judiciary, Part 7: Marbury v. Madison
American Judiciary, Part 7: Marbury v. Madison

Marbury v Madison is the most consequential legal decision in our nation’s history because it established the concept of judicial review in the United States. This principal grants to the judiciary the responsibility to review laws for their constitutionality and gives it the power to void legislation it finds repugnant to the Constitution. That decision was rendered by John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1803, but the road to that decision extends further back.

American Judiciary, Part 4: The Early Life of John Marshall
American Judiciary, Part 4: The Early Life of John Marshall

John Marshall is perhaps the most impactful and influential man in American history who was never president. Almost single handedly, John Marshall created our national judiciary and established it as a branch of government co-equal to the legislative and executive branches.

American Judiciary, Part 3: Last Bastion of the Federalists
American Judiciary, Part 3: Last Bastion of the Federalists

After the Federalists were voted out of office in the fall of 1800 by Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party, the need for reform to the judicial system, the last stronghold of Federalist authority, became the most pressing concern of the outgoing Adams administration.

American Judiciary, Part 2: An Independent Federal Judiciary
American Judiciary, Part 2: An Independent Federal Judiciary

One of the foundational governing principles of the Constitution created at the Philadelphia Convention in the summer of 1787 was a separation of powers between the national legislative, executive, and judicial branches. But while significant operating concepts and responsibilities were set forth for Congress and the Executive in the Constitution, the delegates barely addressed the specific structure of the Judicial branch.

American Judiciary, Part 1: Courts in Early America
American Judiciary, Part 1: Courts in Early America

The court system in Colonial America, not surprisingly, mirrored that of Great Britain and became one of the great sources of discontent as American colonists moved towards independence. The main issue was over who would control or have the greatest influence on the judiciary.

Tom Hand
Next

American Judiciary, Part 7: Marbury v. Madison